产科麻醉安全 40 年进展:里程碑、挑战与未来方向

by Lauren Crosby Zawierucha, MD, MSc;Emily Naoum, MD;May C. M. Pian-Smith, MD, MS

1 10 月, 2025

Summary: 

过去四十年,得益于监测、气道管理、椎管内麻醉技术及多学科照护领域的进步,产科麻醉安全性得到了显著提升。现存挑战包括孕产妇发病率差异、出血、高血压,以及需时刻警惕不断变化的安全威胁。

引言

40 Years of progress in obstetric anesthesia safety: milestones, challenges, and future directions.麻醉学科凭借监测、教育、模拟革新,以及主动反思关键事件中人为因素的意识,成为了患者安全领域的引领者。产科麻醉领域便是典型例证:上世纪后半叶,麻醉相关孕产妇死亡率及麻醉相关并发症发生率显著下降。1 产科麻醉最佳实践指南与卓越标准的发布,持续推动该专业在患者安全层面不断进步。2 然而,孕产妇死亡仍是 20-44 岁女性的主要死因。尽管近年来美国孕产妇死亡率的上升趋势趋于平缓,但在所有高收入国家中,该指标仍处于最差水平。3 根据美国妊娠死亡监测系统数据,麻醉相关并发症现已成为孕产妇死亡最不常见的诱因,但患者病情复杂化、人力需求等新问题,以及种族、社会经济差异等长期存在的挑战,依旧威胁着孕产妇安全。4 麻醉医师可发挥其在急症医学、孕产妇生理学及患者安全原则方面的专业优势,助力解决其他导致孕产妇患病与死亡的各类问题。为纪念《APSF 新闻通讯》创刊 40 周年,本文回顾了产科麻醉领域四十年来的发展成果,剖析了现存挑战,并展望了患者安全领域的未来发展方向。

里程碑

过去 40 年间,随着临床麻醉从全身麻醉逐步转向椎管内镇痛与麻醉,麻醉相关孕产妇死亡率大幅降低。1 麻醉结局的改善,很大程度上得益于椎管内麻醉安全性的提升。现代分娩镇痛正逐步采用低浓度局部麻醉剂并减少局部麻醉剂的总用量,降低了高位椎管内阻滞、局部麻醉剂中毒及手术助产的风险。5,6 钝头穿刺针的应用,让蛛网膜下腔阻滞广泛用于手术麻醉,同时减少了硬膜穿刺后头痛、区域麻醉失败及局部麻醉剂暴露的发生概率。2 针对缓解蛛网膜下腔麻醉所致低血压的最佳血管加压药的研究,以及采用最低有效剂量阿片类药物优化产后镇痛的探索,最大限度降低了椎管内麻醉对母婴的不良影响。7,8 研究表明,椎管内麻醉可降低孕产妇重症疾病的发生率。2,9 产科麻醉亚专科培训能够减少剖腹产手术中全身麻醉的使用,可进一步降低孕产妇的发病率。10 尽管如此,椎管内麻醉并非毫无风险。蛛网膜下腔麻醉相关的高位椎管内阻滞与缓慢性心律失常,是孕产妇心搏骤停的主要诱因。同时,随着孕产妇抗纤溶试验 (WOMAN) 的开展,氨甲环酸在产房的使用日益普及,由此引发了罕见但后果严重的用药错误。11,12

误吸与气道管理失败曾是麻醉相关孕产妇死亡的首要原因,如今致死病例已降至极低水平。视频喉镜的普及、误吸预防措施的实施、困难气道管理准则的发布,以及气道指南中纳入产科专属建议,提升了妊娠期患者全身麻醉的安全性。13 上述一系列椎管内麻醉与全身麻醉革新,使分娩相关麻醉与镇痛达到极高安全水平。14

产科麻醉专业在解决非麻醉因素所致孕产妇患病与死亡问题上,同样发挥着关键作用。麻醉医师对于落实孕产妇早期预警系统、识别并管理导致孕产妇患病和死亡的主要问题至关重要,这些问题包括出血、高血压危象、脓毒症、静脉血栓栓塞及心力衰竭等。15 孕产妇健康创新联盟 (Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health)、加利福尼亚州孕产妇优质照护协作组 ( California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative) 等多家机构,已制定针对上述并发症的综合照护方案,且已证实这类方案能够以具有成本效益的方式降低孕产妇重症发生率。16 即便是在医疗资源匮乏的地区,也已反复证实产后出血的规范化照护能够改善患者结局。17 针对出血与高血压疾病,相关综合照护方案明确要求麻醉医师主动参与多学科规范化照护,以改善患者结局。3

跨学科沟通协作是高可靠性医疗机构的核心特征。产房推行的术前、操作前检查清单与团队短会,能够促进高效的团队协作。18 关键事件后的复盘总结,以及依托受同行保护的质量管控委员会开展患者安全问题上报及审查,可实现团队共同学习,提供解决系统层面安全挑战的机遇,同时为关键事件中潜在的“二次受害者”提供支持。19 此外,模拟演练在围产期急症识别与管理中的普及,进一步强化了安全文化,并有效提升了多学科团队的表现。20

硬膜外

挑战

威胁孕产妇安全的新挑战层出不穷、旧挑战长期存在,包括患者病情复杂化、孕产妇心理健康问题、结局的种族差异,以及就医的地域与社会经济壁垒。孕产妇群体的风险特征正发生改变,慢性疾病患病率持续上升。孕产妇合并症数量与重症风险之间存在剂量依赖性关系。21 产科合并症指数 (OB-CMI) 是风险分层的实用工具,这是一套经过验证的数值评分系统,可通过孕产妇合并症预测重症及死亡风险。开展针对性监测、落实适配风险等级的孕产妇照护、拓展麻醉医师作为围产期会诊医师的职能,是改善孕产妇结局的重要策略。3 产前规划及优化是产科麻醉的核心工作,但超半数妊娠相关死亡发生在产后 7 天至 365 天内。22 麻醉医师具备围手术期医学经验,可精准识别产后病情恶化风险较高的患者,并依据病情的涉及范围与危重程度,将患者照护升级至对应水平。团队协作式照护不应在分娩后终止,麻醉医师可在产后安置规划中发挥重要作用。

孕产妇心理健康问题(包括自杀、物质使用障碍相关的用药过量或中毒)现已与出血、心脏及冠状动脉疾病、感染、血栓栓塞、心肌病并列,成为孕产妇死亡的主要诱因。22

麻醉医师可改善与孕产妇心理健康相关的患病与死亡问题,实现这一点的重要途径包括识别高危患者、开展创伤知情照护,以及优化疼痛管理。23

少数种族与族裔群体的孕产妇死亡率依旧居高不下,即便在孕产妇照护完善的国家,该趋势也持续存在。24 美国黑人女性的重症发生率显著更高,在孕产妇死亡病例中占比过高。25 黑人女性更易因心脏及冠状动脉疾病死亡,出现产后出血时接受升级照护的概率更低,出现硬膜穿刺后头痛时使用硬膜外血贴的可能性也更小。22,26,27

健康的社会决定因素,持续影响着孕产妇患病率与死亡率。地域与社会经济层面的就医壁垒,导致中低收入国家可预防性孕产妇死亡率升高。28 即便是高收入国家,大众获取安全、全面的生殖医疗照护方面依旧存在障碍。这些障碍包括堕胎禁令或限制方面的立法壁垒,这对本就因社会经济条件难以获得适当照护的女性影响尤为严重。29 政策倡导、人力规划与麻醉培训,有助于改善全球医疗照护体系中的此类不公平现象。

未来方向

麻醉照护现代化、患者病情复杂化、长期存在的医疗照护不平等挑战,凸显围产期临床医师亟需完善安全工具包,获取新工具,同时重新聚焦于恪守专业协会制定的照护标准。床旁超声就是此类工具的典型代表,可减少椎管内麻醉相关手术并发症,客观评估误吸风险,协助识别和管理不稳定患者的心肺并发症。30 依托人工智能 (AI)、大数据模型与生物标志物构建的风险预测工具,可为个体化风险分层、早期干预协调、稀缺资源管理提供全新的解决方案。可穿戴设备革新了术后照护模式,居家监测或可解决部分产后患病与死亡问题。31 落实基于共识的标准化照护(如剖腹产后加速康复 (ERAC) 方案),有助于消除种族差异,从患者安全与优质照护层面持续推动专业发展。32

结论

绝大多数妊娠相关死亡本可避免,这反映出产科麻醉领域仍存在诸多照护壁垒与安全隐患。每发生 1 例孕产妇死亡,同期住院的重症孕产妇可达 70-80 例,该统计范围尚不包含产前或产后的患病情况。33 回顾产科麻醉 40 年的发展历程,我们虽在麻醉相关患者结局方面取得了进展,但在推广普惠性孕产妇照护方面,依然任重而道远。麻醉医师可发挥重要作用,利用其临床专业优势,依托循证方案,针对出血、高血压疾病及其他孕产妇健康威胁,提供及时、适配病情危重程度的照护,并实施安全的干预措施。我们应尽可能推广椎管内麻醉的应用,同时针对全身麻醉实施更精细化的患者筛选与安全管控。坚守最佳临床实践标准、应用产科与麻醉领域的新技术、持续培育安全文化,将为这一领域的不断进步提供保障。

 

Lauren Crosby Zawierucha, MD, MSc 是马萨诸塞州总医院(马萨诸塞州波士顿)的产科麻醉进修医师。

Emily Naoum, MD 是马萨诸塞州总医院及哈佛医学院(马萨诸塞州波士顿)的麻醉学助理教授。

May C. M. Pian-Smith, MD, MS 是马萨诸塞州总医院(马萨诸塞州波士顿)的麻醉学副教授。


作者没有利益冲突。


参考文献

  1. Hawkins JL, Chang J, Palmer SK, et al. Anesthesia-related maternal mortality in the United States:1979–2002.Obstet Gynecol.2011;117:69–74.PMID:21173646.
  2. Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology.Anesthesiology.2016;124:270–300.PMID:26580836.
  3. American Society of Anesthesiologists.Recommendations from the ASA Statement on anesthesiologists’ role in reducing maternal mortality and severe maternal morbidity.
    October 23, 2019. https://www.asahq.org/stan­dards-and-practice-parameters/statement-on-anesthesiologists-role-in-reducing-maternal-mortality-and-severe-maternal-morbidity Accessed June 28, 2025.
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Data from the Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System.May 13, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/maternal-mortality/php/pregnancy-mortality-surveillance-data/index.html.Accessed June 28, 2025.
  5. Effect of low-dose mobile versus traditional epidural techniques on mode of delivery: a randomised controlled trial.Lancet.2001;358:19–23.PMID:11454372.
  6. Sia AT, Lim Y, Ocampo C. A comparison of a basal infusion with automated mandatory boluses in parturient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor.Anesth Analg.2007;104:673–678.PMID:17312228.
  7. Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS, et al. Prophylactic phenylephrine infusion for preventing hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.Anesth Analg.2004;98:815–821.PMID:14980943.
  8. Palmer CM, Emerson S, Volgoropolous D, Alves D. Dose-response relationship of intrathecal morphine for postcesarean analgesia.Anesthesiology.1999;90:437–444.PMID:9952150.
  9. Kearns RJ, Kyzayeva A, Halliday LOE, et al. Epidural analgesia during labour and severe maternal morbidity: population based study. BMJ.2024;385:e077190.PMID:38777357.
  10. Li P, Ma X, Han S, et al. Risk factors for failure of conversion from epidural labor analgesia to cesarean section anesthesia and general anesthesia incidence: an updated meta-analysis.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med.2023;36:2278020.PMID:37926901.
  11. Lucas DN, Kursumovic E, Cook TM, et al. Cardiac arrest in obstetric patients receiving anaesthetic care: results from the 7th National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists.Anaesthesia.2024;79:514–523.PMID:38214067.
  12. Patel S. Tranexamic acid-associated intrathecal toxicity during spinal anaesthesia: a narrative review of 22 recent reports.Eur J Anaesthesiol.2023;40:334–342.PMID:36877159.
  13. Mushambi MC, Kinsella SM, Popat M, et al. Obstetric Anaesthetists’ Association and Difficult Airway Society guidelines for the management of difficult and failed tracheal intubation in obstetrics.Anaesthesia.2015;70:1286–1306.PMID:26449292.
  14. Guglielminotti J, Wong CA, Landau R, Li G. Temporal trends in anesthesia-related adverse events in cesarean deliveries, New York State, 2003–2012.Anesthesiology.2015;123:1013–1023.PMID:26448472.
  15. Shields LE, Wiesner S, Klein C, et al. Use of Maternal Early Warning Trigger tool reduces maternal morbidity.Am J Obstet Gynecol.2016;214:527.e1–527.e6.PMID:26924745.
  16. Wiesehan EC, Keesara SR, Krissberg JR, et al. State perinatal quality collaborative for reducing severe maternal morbidity from hemorrhage: a cost-effectiveness analysis.Obstet Gynecol.2023;141:387–394.PMID:36649352.
  17. Gallos I, Devall A, Martin J, et al. Randomized trial of early detection and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage.N Engl J Med.2023;389:11–21.PMID:37158447.
  18. Girnius A, Snyder C, Czarny H, et al. Preoperative multidisciplinary team huddle improves communication and safety for unscheduled cesarean deliveries: a system redesign using improvement science.Anesth Analg.2024;139:1199–1209.PMID:39269911.
  19. McQuaid-Hanson E, Pian-Smith MC.Huddles and debriefings: improving communication on labor and delivery.Anesthesiol Clin.2017;35:59–67.PMID:28131120.
  20. Burnett GW, Goldhaber-Fiebert SN.The role of simulation training in patients’ safety in anaesthesia and perioperative medicine.BJA Education.2024;24:7–12.PMID:38495746.
  21. Fink DA, Kilday D, Cao Z, et al. Trends in maternal mortality and severe maternal morbidity during delivery-related hospitalizations in the United States, 2008 to 2021.JAMA Netw Open.2023;6:e2317641.PMID:37347486.
  22. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Data from Maternal Mortality Review Committees (MMRCs) 2023.Updated November 2, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/maternal-mortality/php/data-research/mmrc-2017-2019.html.Accessed June 20, 2025.
  23. Kountanis JA, Roberts M, Admon LK, et al. Maternal deaths due to suicide and overdose in the state of Michigan from 2008 to 2018.Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM.2023;5:100811.PMID:36379442.
  24. Bamber JH, Goldacre R, Lucas DN, et al. A national cohort study to investigate the association between ethnicity and the provision of care in obstetric anaesthesia in England between 2011 and 2021.Anaesthesia .2023;78:820–829.PMID:36893444.
  25. Hales EDS, Ferketich AK, Klebanoff MA.The racial disparity of severe maternal morbidity across weeks of gestation: a cross-sectional analysis of the 2019 National Inpatient Sample.Am J Obstet Gynecol.2024;231:126.e1–126.e12.PMID:37979826.
  26. Guan CS, Boyer TM, Darwin KC, et al. Racial disparities in care escalation for postpartum hemorrhage requiring transfusion.Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM.2023;5:100938.PMID:36948294.
  27. Potnuru PP, Jonna S, Orlando B, Nwokolo OO.Racial and ethnic disparities in epidural blood patch utilization among obstetric patients in the United States: a nationwide analysis, 2016–2020.Anesth Analg.2024;139:1190–1198.PMID:39715513.
  28. World Health Organization.Maternal mortality 2023.Updated February 22, 2023. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/maternal-mortality.Accessed June 20,2025.
  29. Forbes L, Werner E, Lappen JR.Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Position Statement: access to abortion care.Am J Obstet Gynecol.2024;231:B7–b8.PMID:38588965.
  30. Zieleskiewicz L, Bouvet L, Einav S, et al. Diagnostic point-of-care ultrasound: applications in obstetric anaesthetic management.Anaesthesia.2018;73:1265–1279.PMID:30047997.
  31. Yang H, Dervin G, Madden S, et al. Postoperative home monitoring after joint replacement: feasibility study.JMIR Perioper Med.2018;1:e10168.PMID:33401364.
  32. Patel K, Zakowski M. Enhanced recovery after cesarean: current and emerging trends.Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2021;11:136–144.PMID:33679253.
  33. Declercq E, Zephyrin LC.Severe maternal morbidity in the United States: a primer.October 28, 2021. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2021/oct/severe-maternal-morbidity-united-states-primer.Accessed June 28, 2025.